Among all the talks that I made with officials in
      the various national appealing bureaus, the longest one did not last more than 15 minutes.  In addition, most of the receptionists were quite
      impatient, as if we were making troubles for them.
-- The Author
To the leaders of the Chinese Central
      Government,
Greetings! 
      Im Zhang Xuelin, 31 years old.  Im
      a villager in the Xujia Village, Beiguan Town, Weicheng District, Weifang City in
      Shangdong Province.  On February 21 of this
      year, my mother, Ms. Chen Zixiu, a 58-year-old Falun Gong practitioner, was beaten and
      tortured to death within 3 days in the secret "forced transformation" site in
      Weicheng District.  Here I would like to
      describe the whole course of the incident (I wrote two articles before) and state my own
      retrospection and thinking of the past half year.  I
      wish that the government would know the truth, as well as the genuine feelings and living
      situations of our common people.  Even if I am
      detained again and die like my mother, I would not hesitate or feel sorry about it.
After the death of my mother
      I once wrote two articles at the end of
      February and mailed them to the administration bodies of the office of State Councils, the
      office of the Central Government, Chinese Central Television Station and other news media.  I provided the sources and true stories of the
      incidents to them, as well as to some residents in the local area.  In early March, according to police, my article
      was posted on the Internet.  Just because of
      these two articles, the police summoned me four times until April 3, which totaled 107
      hours.  On April 17, I was held by the police
      in the name of administrative detention for 15 days, based on Item 5 in Article 19 in
      "the Provisions to the Management of Social Security."  Their charge was "distorting the facts and
      disturbing social order".  Even now, I
      still dont know how I distorted the facts and what facts I distorted?  What are the facts supposed to be?  After being released, I gained certain freedom
      since they withdrew restricted surveillance on my home by the administrative officials and
      police.  I have been constantly appealing to
      the police, legislative and administrative bureaus.  I
      do wish to believe in the law and the government.  
Forced Cremation
      On March 11, the police verbally
      explained to me the results of my mothers pathological analysis.   I dont know much about medicine.   So I requested the forensic reports, but was
      denied.  But I understood from the
      pathological analysis that acute severe pulmonary emphysema could lead to death in a very
      short period.  My moms lungs were quite
      healthy, and before she left home she had no such symptoms at all.  She must have been beaten up and tortured to
      death, which is undeniable.  However, I did
      not have any written explanation or conclusion from the police.  The police once suggested that I  check the Criminal Law and the Codes for criminal
      procedure.  They would examine the case and
      then pass it to the investigation bureau.  
On March 16, from 5:30PM to 7:00PM, the working group, which consisted of
      nearly 20 leaders from police, investigation
      bureau and governmental officials
      of the village, town and district; sent notice to my brother and me,
      demanding us to go to the cremation field at 9:00AM the
      next morning.  We immediately expressed our
      opposition.  At the same time, we questioned
      all of them: What disease caused the death, what had my mother
      gone
      through in those 3 days, and the relationship
      between the tortures and her death.  I knew who the murderers were.  I knew that they were still at large.  At 9:00AM
      on March 17, we arrived at the cremation field.
        The cremation field was heavily guarded.
        I estimated that there were about 200 people and 20 police vehicles; which
      were all from the police, the investigation
      bureau and the court.  One of my
      relatives and I again presented the opposition from the family: we did not agree on the
      cremation and submitted
      a written request
      for the storage of the corpse and the rights to handle
      it by ourselves.  At
      noon, the chief of the legal section in the District
      police station, accompanied by the leaders of the
      administrative office, gave us the final
      notice, "no matter whether you agree or not, the
      cremation has to be carried out at noon;
      someone will be responsible for it."  However,
      when we requested the certificate of cremation later on, nobody was responsible to handle
      our case.   
The
      replies from the different levels of government offices and judicial departments:
I believed that the police and judicial
      department would have a conclusion after examination of this case, so I started to request
      the forensic reports.  Here are the various responses:
District Police Department: the forensic reports had been finished
      a long time ago, but we could not give it to you.  What
      we told you earlier was the result (referring to their verbal message about
      the pathological analysis).  If you dont
      agree, you can apply for reexamination
      to the higher authorities.
City Police Department: If you disagreed with the forensic
      reports from the District Police Bureau, you have to submit the certificate of the
      entrustment from the District Office and the materials from the initial forensic
      examination. 
District Police Department: during the last forensic anatomy,
      there were officials from the City Police Department.  So there was no need to submit materials.  If you dont believe, you may ask them.  (However, I believe the primary criminals to
      organize the torture were the officials in the District
      offices.)
I also visited the investigation bureau and the court.  Their
      responses are:
City Middle-level Peoples Court:
      Criminal cases cannot be indicted by individuals and should be brought to public
      prosecution.  
City
      Investigation Bureau: We do not accept any cases related to Falun Gong, even
      related homicide cases.   
The High-level Province's Investigation
      Bureau:  You had better hurry to sue the murderer!
Province's Administrative Office and Government Office: Dont you
      know what kind of organization Falun Gong is?  (They
      even questioned me back) Why
      didnt they accept your case?  Dont you know?
Province's Police Department: (I submitted the articles
      that I and the eye-witnesses wrote) your mom died from a heart attack.  Didnt you agree with that yourself?  (I have never agreed with that.)   Why do you come here to make troubles!  Go away!  Go
      away! Go away!
The Offices of State Councils and Central
      Government: Go appeal to the State Police Department.
The Highest Procuratorial Organ: Go appeal to the State Police Department.
The National Women Association:  Youve got to stop appealing around.
        Please go home quickly.  There are some nation's policies that we could not explain and
      there is no way to explain.  Yet, we are not able to do anything for you.  
The State Police Department: I wrote
      a letter to Weicheng District's
      Police Department on June 19.  (The original sealed
      letter was passed to the District's Police Department)
The District's
      Police Department:   after repeated requests, there was still no written decision as of July 21.  (Because I did not agree with the administrative
      detention by the District's Police Department, this was also included in the
      appealing procedure).  
The District's
      Police Department: The
      decision was made to sustain the administrative detention
      applied.
The District's Court: they received my letter before
      the due date. After my repeated requests,
      they indicated verbally that: we would not establish a court case for your administrative
      lawsuit.  We could not give you the reasons
      and the written decision on why we didn't
      establish the case.  You can talk directly to
      our higher offices.
The District's Representative Office of Peoples Congress:
        The District Peoples Court did not establish a court case, but they
      should give you something; however, they felt that the decision from the District's Police Department was quite appropriate.  Youd better go to the Middle-level Court. 
The Middle-level Court:  (Response
      from telephone consultation) Why
      did the District Court say that?  You should have the legal evidence to point out that what they did was
      wrong.
        Have you found out the legal evidence? Then the phone was abruptly
      hung up.
The City Administrative Office and Government Office: we could not deal with this case.  We dont handle this kind of cases.  You are really young and capable!
The Highest Peoples Court: without
      the trials from local peoples court, you should not appeal here.  If the court still does not accept the case, you should go
      to the State Police Department again.
The Office of the National Peoples Congress:  without
      the ruling from the Court, we would not accept your case. 
      
The second visit to the State Police Department:
        (another police officer received me, while he did not know the whole course
      of appealing) He first drafted a letter to the City Police Department; he patiently listened to me while I explained
      it all to him.  He
      said: "People should not be beaten to death even if they
      practice Falun Gong!" He was shocked: "The
      police even detained you?"  
He wanted to say something but held
      it on a second thought.  He finally
      said: "Trust the law".
        Only at that moment, I had the feeling of being consoled.  But who knows what kind of leaders that our local
      judicial department relies on.
The State Judicial Department: (the response from telephone consultation, concerning
      the death of my mother)
      You may ask the State Police Department, regarding whether this case is
      completely closed or is set aside.  The cause
      of death must be explained clearly. 
I asked: "Is it due to the issue of Falun Gong that we encountered this consequence. They answered: It should not be.
However, three days later, when I went
      to the office of the State Judicial
      Department in person, I got a different
      reply: Is this what the local court told
      you?  What can the judicial department do?  (The police wont accept the case of my mothers
      death) The administrative body has its arrangement.  Ok, youd better stop the appeal and obey the
      order from the administration. 
However, according to a fellow-villager
      from the Shandong province who appealed to
      the State Police Department at the same time, there was one
      Falun Gong practitioner who came to here to appeal.  He
      got beaten up right after he claimed to practice Falun Gong.
The Judicial Department of the State Councils:
        (after they heard about my mother
      being tortured to death due to the practice of Falun Gong, they hummed and hawed for quite
      a while.)  This matter is quite complicated.  Youd better go to the Supervisory Department of the State Committee of Discipline Examination. 
The Supervisory Department of the State Committee of Discipline Examination:  go to the
      State Police Department.
In my effort of appealing numerous times, I saw and met the large assembly of
      appealing groups.  There were so many
      unbelievable things, but they appeared to be so common, except for the Falun Gong
      practitioners being detained by the police.  According
      to the policeman who was in charge of receiving appeals from Falun Gong practitioners at
      the gate, among the 100 people who appealed, there would be no more than 10 cases being
      resolved.  There was so much disappointment,
      anger and hopelessness.  Among all the talks that I made with the officials
      in the various national appealing bureaus, the longest one did not last more than 15
      minutes.  In addition, most of receptionists
      were quite impatient, as if we were making troubles for them.
(To
      be continued)
 
              
              
              
                      